Incompleteness and the Romance With Science: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| author = [[Marvin Eli Kirsh]] | | author = [[Marvin Eli Kirsh]] | ||
| published = 2007 | | published = 2007 | ||
| num_pages = 4 | | num_pages = 4 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
It is argued that qualities of complete/incomplete science theory do not relate to the fertility or diversity or validity of science theory, but correspond with social, behavioral, moral values, and trespass into the realms of innate knowing, absolutes, cognition and behavior. It is suggested that terms employed such as "innately incomplete" are redundant in description - i.e. "flats are innately flat" - a curved dwelling would not be suitable for habitation, it is similarly very difficult to find other words to speak of the notion of science as incomplete.</span> | It is argued that qualities of complete/incomplete science theory do not relate to the fertility or diversity or validity of science theory, but correspond with social, behavioral, moral values, and trespass into the realms of innate knowing, absolutes, cognition and behavior. It is suggested that terms employed such as "innately incomplete" are redundant in description - i.e. "flats are innately flat" - a curved dwelling would not be suitable for habitation, it is similarly very difficult to find other words to speak of the notion of science as incomplete.</span> | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|incompleteness romance science]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity|incompleteness romance science]] | |||
Latest revision as of 19:38, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Incompleteness and the Romance With Science |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Marvin Eli Kirsh |
| Published | 2007 |
| No. of pages | 4 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
It is argued that qualities of complete/incomplete science theory do not relate to the fertility or diversity or validity of science theory, but correspond with social, behavioral, moral values, and trespass into the realms of innate knowing, absolutes, cognition and behavior. It is suggested that terms employed such as "innately incomplete" are redundant in description - i.e. "flats are innately flat" - a curved dwelling would not be suitable for habitation, it is similarly very difficult to find other words to speak of the notion of science as incomplete.