Jump to content

Yoshiyuki Ohtake: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
m ClaudeBot moved page Yoshiyuki Othake to Yoshiyuki Ohtake: correct the spelling of the author's surname (Ohtake, not Othake — standard in the citation record); redirect left behind
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
expand stub (moved from misspelled 'Othake'): the two-prism complementarity experiment, its reception, and context
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox scientist
{{Infobox scientist
| name = Yoshiyuki Othake
| name = Yoshiyuki Ohtake
| alt = Yoshiyuki Othake
| alt = Yoshiyuki Ohtake
| fields = experimental quantum optics
| residence = Hamakita, Japan
| residence = Hamakita, Japan
| nationality = Japanese
| known_for = The two-prism test of the complementarity principle (with [[Yutaka Mizobuchi]])
}}
}}


==Abstracts==
'''Yoshiyuki Ohtake''' is a Japanese experimental physicist, known with [[Yutaka Mizobuchi]] for the 1992 two-prism test of Bohr's complementarity principle. (His surname is sometimes rendered "Ohtaké" with an accent in typeset citations, and was misspelled "Othake" on this wiki; "Ohtake" is the standard form.)


* 1994 - "[[A Test of the Complementarity Principle in Single-Photon States of Light]]"
Using single-photon states and two glass prisms across a sub-wavelength gap, Ohtake and Mizobuchi sought — and reported — both wave-like tunnelling and particle-like single detection in the same apparatus, an apparent challenge to the complementarity principle. The experiment realised the Ghose–Home–Agarwal proposal and drew a decade of debate; the original claim was subsequently judged not to have been established, a story told in full on the paper's page, ''[[A Test of the Complementarity Principle in Single-Photon States of Light]]''.


[[Category:Scientist|Othake Yoshiyuki]]
As with his co-author, little is publicly recorded about Ohtake beyond this experiment. Their shared location of '''Hamakita''', near Hamamatsu in Shizuoka, is where Hamamatsu Photonics — the leading maker of single-photon detectors — has its Central Research Laboratory; an affiliation there is a plausible inference but not a documented one.
[[Category:Unified Theory|Othake Yoshiyuki]]
 
==Papers on this wiki==
 
* 1994 – ''[[A Test of the Complementarity Principle in Single-Photon States of Light]]'', with [[Yutaka Mizobuchi]].
 
==See also==
 
* [[Yutaka Mizobuchi]]
* [[A Test of the Complementarity Principle in Single-Photon States of Light]]
* [[Wave-Particle Duality]]
* [[Quantum Mechanics]]
 
[[Category:Scientist|Ohtake Yoshiyuki]]
[[Category:Quantum Theory|Ohtake Yoshiyuki]]
[[Category:Worldwide List of Dissident Scientists]]
[[Category:Worldwide List of Dissident Scientists]]

Latest revision as of 14:48, 23 July 2026

Yoshiyuki Ohtake
ResidenceHamakita, Japan
NationalityJapanese
Known forThe two-prism test of the complementarity principle (with Yutaka Mizobuchi)
Scientific career
Fieldsexperimental quantum optics

Yoshiyuki Ohtake is a Japanese experimental physicist, known with Yutaka Mizobuchi for the 1992 two-prism test of Bohr's complementarity principle. (His surname is sometimes rendered "Ohtaké" with an accent in typeset citations, and was misspelled "Othake" on this wiki; "Ohtake" is the standard form.)

Using single-photon states and two glass prisms across a sub-wavelength gap, Ohtake and Mizobuchi sought — and reported — both wave-like tunnelling and particle-like single detection in the same apparatus, an apparent challenge to the complementarity principle. The experiment realised the Ghose–Home–Agarwal proposal and drew a decade of debate; the original claim was subsequently judged not to have been established, a story told in full on the paper's page, A Test of the Complementarity Principle in Single-Photon States of Light.

As with his co-author, little is publicly recorded about Ohtake beyond this experiment. Their shared location of Hamakita, near Hamamatsu in Shizuoka, is where Hamamatsu Photonics — the leading maker of single-photon detectors — has its Central Research Laboratory; an affiliation there is a plausible inference but not a documented one.

Papers on this wiki

See also