Jump to content

Infinite Universe Theory (2007 paper): Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
Preserve the 2007 NPA paper record; the main title now covers the theory and book
 
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| published = 2007
| published = 2007
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[4]]
| volume = 4
| number = [[1]]
| number = 1
| num_pages = 4
| num_pages = 4
| pages = 20-23
| pages = 20-23
Line 24: Line 24:
[[Category:Gravity|infinite universe theory]]
[[Category:Gravity|infinite universe theory]]
[[Category:Cosmology|infinite universe theory]]
[[Category:Cosmology|infinite universe theory]]
[[Category:Big Bang]]

Latest revision as of 09:40, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleInfinite Universe Theory
Author(s)Glenn Borchardt
KeywordsBig Bang Theory, infinity, infinite, inseparability
Published2007
JournalProceedings of the NPA
Volume4
Number1
No. of pages4
Pages20-23

This page records the 2007 conference paper. For the theory and the 2017 book, see Infinite Universe Theory.

Abstract

The inevitable rejection of the Big Bang Theory (BBT) will lead to a more enlightened and more logical theory, but what will it be? The BBT will be replaced by the Infinite Universe Theory (IUT). It will produce the greatest revolution in science since Copernicus. A change of this magnitude will not come easily, probably not for decades, but it will come. The outlines of IUT can be seen by examining the logical defects of the BBT. A side-by-side comparison of the two theories not only shows the logical superiority of IUT, but it points the way to fertile fields of research and experimentation while rejecting still others. Among the predictions of IUT: time is motion; there is an ether; light is wave motion; the galactic redshift is due primarily to absorption; gravity involves a push, not a pull; there is a complement to the Second Law of Thermodynamics; light bending near massive bodies is refraction due to a dense etherosphere; galactic ages will not correlate with distance from Earth; the universe is Euclidean and not expanding; empty space and solid matter are ideas, not reality; matter has only three dimensions. Among the illegitimate pursuits: cosmogony, non-Euclidean mathematics; unification of physics via a single equation; objectification of time; and energy viewed as matterless motion. Welcome to the infinite universe!

External links