The Relativity Principle in Inertial and Accelerated Frames: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| published = 2009 | | published = 2009 | ||
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | | journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 20 | ||
| number = | | number = 3 | ||
| pages = 43-48 | | pages = 43-48 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|relativity principle inertial accelerated frames]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|relativity principle inertial accelerated frames]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity|relativity principle inertial accelerated frames]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:40, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | The Relativity Principle in Inertial and Accelerated Frames |
| Author(s) | [[]] |
| Keywords | Relativity Principle, Inertial Frame, Accelerated Frame |
| Published | 2009 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 20 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 43-48 |
Abstract
The aim of this work is to discuss how the principle of relativity must be interpreted within inertial refer-ence frames in order to be applied rightly by non-inertial observers. It is shown that when an accelerated ob-server assumes that two or more inertial frames are at rest consecutively, some incoherencies arise, such as clock and Ehrenfest?s paradoxes. These paradoxes are solved and the inconsistency of the postulates of the so-called special relativity theory, which is an inappropriate interpretation of the relativity principle, is concluded.