A Note Regarding Relativity: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| published = 1991 | | published = 1991 | ||
| journal = [[Physics Essays]] | | journal = [[Physics Essays]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 4 | ||
| number = | | number = 1 | ||
| num_pages = 2 | | num_pages = 2 | ||
| pages = 42-44 | | pages = 42-44 | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
[[Category:Relativity|note regarding relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity|note regarding relativity]] | ||
[[Category:Time]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:39, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | A Note Regarding Relativity |
| Author(s) | [[]] |
| Keywords | time dilation, special relativity, twin paradox, Einstein |
| Published | 1991 |
| Journal | Physics Essays |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 1 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
| Pages | 42-44 |
Abstract
A minor error in Einstein's 1905 seminal work on relativity, ?gOn the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies,?h is used to resolve the well?]known ?gtwin paradox.?h This is not a refutation of relativity theory, because the correctness of the transformation formulas is presumed.