Jump to content

Relativity, Space and Time: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| title = Relativity, Space and Time
| title = Relativity, Space and Time
| author = [[Geert Boersma]]
| author = [[Geert Boersma]]
| keywords = Theory of Relativity, Lorentz transformation, absolute space, Sagnac effect, absolute time
| published = 2004
| published = 2004
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| volume = [[15]]
| volume = 15
| number = [[3]]
| number = 3
| pages = 55-58
| pages = 55-58
}}
}}
Line 15: Line 16:
[[Category:Scientific Paper|relativity space time]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|relativity space time]]


[[Category:Relativity]]
[[Category:Relativity|relativity space time]]

Latest revision as of 09:38, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleRelativity, Space and Time
Author(s)Geert Boersma
KeywordsTheory of Relativity, Lorentz transformation, absolute space, Sagnac effect, absolute time
Published2004
JournalGalilean Electrodynamics
Volume15
Number3
Pages55-58

Abstract

The theory of relativity (RT) is inconsistent: two twins, re-meeting after separation, will each be younger than the other. Nevertheless, the RT is widely accepted, mainly because of the experimental evidence. An analysis of the evidence, however, reveals that the experimental evidence is for E = mc2, but not for the notion of relativity. The Sagnac effect is even contrary to the RT. In this case RT can only be saved by the use of a Galilean transformation instead of a Lorentz transformation, and this is impermissible in a four-dimensional space-time. As it is the notion of relativity itself that causes the problem, there is no reason to stick to four-dimensional space-time. Instead, the freedom to choose space and time, which Einstein propagated, will be used to choose the old system: three-dimensional space and one-dimensional time, without the conceptions of absolute space and absolute time. A new theory can probably be developed, using Stokes?s idea of a compressible, irrotational ether, without his idea of a mechanical ether, but with an ether without mass.