Jump to content

A Relativity Theorem, with Huge Consequences: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6275.pdf Link to paper]
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6275.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[David V Connell]]
| author = [[David V Connell]]
| keywords = relativity, reference frame
| published = 2011
| published = 2011
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[8]]
| volume = 8
| num_pages = 3
| num_pages = 3
| pages = 129-132
| pages = 129-132
Line 18: Line 19:
[[Category:Scientific Paper|relativity theorem huge consequences]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|relativity theorem huge consequences]]


[[Category:Relativity]]
[[Category:Relativity|relativity theorem huge consequences]]

Revision as of 09:37, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleA Relativity Theorem, with Huge Consequences
Read in fullLink to paper
Author(s)David V Connell
Keywordsrelativity, reference frame
Published2011
JournalProceedings of the NPA
Volume8
No. of pages3
Pages129-132

Read the full paper here

Abstract

Previously missing, but not conspicuous by their absence, local and universal constants are now defined, and a standard test for them based on relativity is created, resulting in three universal constants, all having the same dimensions. From this and little else, a valid set of relativistic changes for each of the two types of reference frame, agreeing exactly with sets previously derived from laws of physics, is derived in only a few lines. A different set, adopted by SR and GR, disagrees with the laws of nature, which invalidates those theories, and more than a dozen consequences are given to illustrate how much some physics theories have been diverted from Nature?s truths.