Separating Truth from Myth in SRT: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| published = 2008 | | published = 2008 | ||
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | | journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 19 | ||
| number = | | number = 4 | ||
| pages = 69-74 | | pages = 69-74 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|separating truth myth srt]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|separating truth myth srt]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity|separating truth myth srt]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:36, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Separating Truth from Myth in SRT |
| Author(s) | Nizar Hamdan |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 19 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 69-74 |
Abstract
This paper identifies the fundamental conceptual flaw that has persisted for the past 100 years. The flaw is the equivalence of a ?mass? and ?energy?, and the description of such equivalence by the relationship E = mc2. In this paper, we show an exact proof for E = mc2 starting from classical Mechanics. This is done from the point of view of one inertial frame, not two, and without invoking the theory of electromagnetism [1], as well as without invoking SRT [2]. The existence of an invariant 3d- force is important to get the relativistic mechanics from the relationship E = mc2.