Nightmares of the Art of Measuring: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| published = 2007 | | published = 2007 | ||
| journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]] | | journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]] | ||
| number = | | number = 42 | ||
| num_pages = 6 | | num_pages = 6 | ||
| pages = 22-25 | | pages = 22-25 | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
There are two classes of errors encountered in investigating claims of anomalous energy. One deals with experimental errors, such as misreading and misusing instrumentation or improper handling of uncertainties and errors. The other deals particularly with mistakes made in testing thrust forces. A partial list of the former was published in ESJ 36. What follows is among the first attempts at the latter.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | There are two classes of errors encountered in investigating claims of anomalous energy. One deals with experimental errors, such as misreading and misusing instrumentation or improper handling of uncertainties and errors. The other deals particularly with mistakes made in testing thrust forces. A partial list of the former was published in ESJ 36. What follows is among the first attempts at the latter. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|nightmares art measuring]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:33, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Nightmares of the Art of Measuring |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | George D Hathaway |
| Keywords | error analysis, experimental technique, instrumentation, overunity, troubleshooting |
| Published | 2007 |
| Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
| Number | 42 |
| No. of pages | 6 |
| Pages | 22-25 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
There are two classes of errors encountered in investigating claims of anomalous energy. One deals with experimental errors, such as misreading and misusing instrumentation or improper handling of uncertainties and errors. The other deals particularly with mistakes made in testing thrust forces. A partial list of the former was published in ESJ 36. What follows is among the first attempts at the latter.