Einstein's Theory Revised by Person(s) Unknown: Difference between revisions
Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6048.pdf Link to paper] | | url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6048.pdf Link to paper] | ||
| author = [[Roger J Anderton]] | | author = [[Roger J Anderton]] | ||
| keywords = Einstein, Special Relativity | |||
| published = 2011 | | published = 2011 | ||
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]] | | journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 8 | ||
| num_pages = 2 | | num_pages = 2 | ||
| pages = 17-18 | | pages = 17-18 | ||
Revision as of 09:33, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Einstein's Theory Revised by Person(s) Unknown |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Roger J Anderton |
| Keywords | Einstein, Special Relativity |
| Published | 2011 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 8 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
| Pages | 17-18 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Einstein's Special Relativity presents major problems to us because he failed to clearly state his theory, changed his mind numerous times, got his math in a mess, and so forth Not only that, his theory was revised by person or persons unknown. As will now be explained, that means ?we? cannot even know what his theory ?is? - i.e. not know what he intended his theory to be - and also not know what these unknown person(s) that revised the theory intended that theory to be. If the amended 1905 paper of Einstein's Special relativity were a legal document, it would be dismissed as bogus, because it would be impossible to know what the amendments mean. The foundation of modern physics is thus a far bigger hoax than the Piltdown man.