Jump to content

Five Frozen Needles CF Protocol: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox paper
{{Infobox paper
| title = Five Frozen Needles CF Protocol
| title = Five Frozen Needles CF Protocol
| url = [http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BassRWfivefrozen.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Robert W Bass]]
| author = [[Robert W Bass]]
| keywords = [[Electricity]], [[Matter creation]], [[Helium]], [[Cold fusion]]
| keywords = [[Electricity]], [[Matter creation]], [[Helium]], [[Cold fusion]]
| published = 2002
| published = 2002
| journal = [[Journal of New Energy]]
| journal = [[Journal of New Energy]]
| volume = [[6]]
| volume = 6
| number = [[2]]
| number = 2
| pages = 30-33
| pages = 30-33
}}
}}
'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BassRWfivefrozen.pdf here]


==Abstract==
==Abstract==
Line 15: Line 18:


[[Category:Scientific Paper|frozen needles cf protocol]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|frozen needles cf protocol]]
[[Category:Cold Fusion]]

Latest revision as of 09:32, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleFive Frozen Needles CF Protocol
Read in fullLink to paper
Author(s)Robert W Bass
KeywordsElectricity, Matter creation, Helium, Cold fusion
Published2002
JournalJournal of New Energy
Volume6
Number2
Pages30-33

Read the full paper here

Abstract

The following protocol is designed to be intuitively convincing to a layman who, if told that needles 2, 3 and 4 have been pulsed with constant-voltage DC-electricity for twice, thrice and quadruple the amount of time as needle 1, and then measured to contain twice, thrice and quadruple the amount of He4 as the first needle, will instantly reject any doubt that the electrical pulse was creating He4 from some form of nuclear-chemistry process whose action was directly proportional to the amount of DC electrical energy used. At the same time, the protocol is sufficiently statistically sophisticated in its rigorous application of Experiment Design theory as to satisfy the most skeptical and informed critic.