Kinematic Confirmation of Thomas Paradox: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| published = 1993 | | published = 1993 | ||
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | | journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 4 | ||
| number = | | number = 2 | ||
| pages = 23-28 | | pages = 23-28 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
The identification of the Thomas rotation angle of Cartesian coordinates with the angle between relativistic composite velocities leads to a conflict with the concept of intertial motion. As a consequence Thomas rotation is unable to extend the 1 + 1 Lorentz transformation to 1 + 3 dimensions. | The identification of the Thomas rotation angle of Cartesian coordinates with the angle between relativistic composite velocities leads to a conflict with the concept of intertial motion. As a consequence Thomas rotation is unable to extend the 1 + 1 Lorentz transformation to 1 + 3 dimensions. | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|kinematic confirmation thomas paradox]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity|kinematic confirmation thomas paradox]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:31, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Kinematic Confirmation of Thomas Paradox |
| Author(s) | Constantin I Mocanu |
| Keywords | Thomas rotation angle, Cartesian coordinates, relativistic composite velocities, inertial motion |
| Published | 1993 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 23-28 |
Abstract
The identification of the Thomas rotation angle of Cartesian coordinates with the angle between relativistic composite velocities leads to a conflict with the concept of intertial motion. As a consequence Thomas rotation is unable to extend the 1 + 1 Lorentz transformation to 1 + 3 dimensions.