Experimental Investigation of the Doppler Effect, Continued: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| published = 1993 | | published = 1993 | ||
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | | journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 4 | ||
| number = | | number = 1 | ||
| pages = 7-8 | | pages = 7-8 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
The paper reports measurement of the Doppler effect in the same way as on previous occasions [1. 2], but in the present series of experiments the working space is filled with nitrogen rather than hydrogen. The previous conclusion, that the Doppler effect is correctly expressed by the classical, not by the relativistic formula, is again confirmed. | The paper reports measurement of the Doppler effect in the same way as on previous occasions [1. 2], but in the present series of experiments the working space is filled with nitrogen rather than hydrogen. The previous conclusion, that the Doppler effect is correctly expressed by the classical, not by the relativistic formula, is again confirmed. | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|experimental investigation doppler effect continued]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity|experimental investigation doppler effect continued]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:31, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Experimental Investigation of the Doppler Effect, Continued |
| Author(s) | Lev A Pobedonostsev |
| Keywords | Doppler effect, nitrogen, relativistic formula |
| Published | 1993 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 7-8 |
Abstract
The paper reports measurement of the Doppler effect in the same way as on previous occasions [1. 2], but in the present series of experiments the working space is filled with nitrogen rather than hydrogen. The previous conclusion, that the Doppler effect is correctly expressed by the classical, not by the relativistic formula, is again confirmed.