Jump to content

Remembering the Great Comet: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| published = 2012
| published = 2012
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[9]]
| volume = 9
| num_pages = 9
| num_pages = 9
| pages = 597-605
| pages = 597-605
Line 14: Line 14:
==Abstract==
==Abstract==


How did it happen that the tranquil and predictable planet Venus inspired memories of terror throughout the ancient world?  Within all of the well documented cultures, astronomical traditions describe Venus in the language of a comet. Given the specialized focus of historians, few indeed have noted this remarkable and universal pattern. But the collective, seemingly preposterous memory is now established beyond any reasonable doubt: the sciences cannot afford to ignore the implications.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
How did it happen that the tranquil and predictable planet Venus inspired memories of terror throughout the ancient world?  Within all of the well documented cultures, astronomical traditions describe Venus in the language of a comet. Given the specialized focus of historians, few indeed have noted this remarkable and universal pattern. But the collective, seemingly preposterous memory is now established beyond any reasonable doubt: the sciences cannot afford to ignore the implications.
 
[[Category:Scientific Paper|remembering great comet]]

Latest revision as of 09:30, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleRemembering the Great Comet
Read in fullLink to paper
Author(s)David Talbott
Published2012
JournalProceedings of the NPA
Volume9
No. of pages9
Pages597-605

Read the full paper here

Abstract

How did it happen that the tranquil and predictable planet Venus inspired memories of terror throughout the ancient world? Within all of the well documented cultures, astronomical traditions describe Venus in the language of a comet. Given the specialized focus of historians, few indeed have noted this remarkable and universal pattern. But the collective, seemingly preposterous memory is now established beyond any reasonable doubt: the sciences cannot afford to ignore the implications.