Jump to content

Experimental Disproof of Special Relativity: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| title = Experimental Disproof of Special Relativity
| title = Experimental Disproof of Special Relativity
| author = [[Antonis Agathangelidis]]
| author = [[Antonis Agathangelidis]]
| keywords = special relativity theory, Lorentz transformations, General Relativity, SRT
| published = 1998
| published = 1998
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| volume = [[9]]
| volume = 9
| number = [[2]]
| number = 2
| pages = 23-26
| pages = 23-26
}}
}}
Line 15: Line 16:
[[Category:Scientific Paper|experimental disproof special relativity]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|experimental disproof special relativity]]


[[Category:Relativity]]
[[Category:Relativity|experimental disproof special relativity]]

Latest revision as of 09:30, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleExperimental Disproof of Special Relativity
Author(s)Antonis Agathangelidis
Keywordsspecial relativity theory, Lorentz transformations, General Relativity, SRT
Published1998
JournalGalilean Electrodynamics
Volume9
Number2
Pages23-26

Abstract

According to Einstein, Special Relativity Theory (SRT) is valid for inertial reference frames in constant relative translation. But such a condition is never fulfilled in nature, where curved paths and accelerations are everywhere present. This situation implies questions that are devastating for SRT; any answer at all is fatal to SRT and to the Lorentz transformations (LT?s) it implies. Furthermore, comparative analysis of classical optical experiments and other ?relativistic? phenomena reveals arbitrariness and confusion about the experimental validation of SRT. Actually, what has been experimentally established is an unclear amalgam of SRT and general relativity theory (GRT). The foundations of both theories are thus brought into question.