Jump to content

The Jonson-Keele Debate: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
| published = 2007
| published = 2007
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[4]]
| volume = 4
| number = [[1]]
| number = 1
| pages = 96
| pages = 96
}}
}}
Line 11: Line 11:
==Abstract==
==Abstract==


For almost one year ago the two NPA participants Mr. James Keele and Mr. Jan Olof Jonson, both Master of Science Electric Engineers, performed an open E-mail debate before a part of the NPA members, about the SRT Theory of Electromagnetics for Moving Charges. The debate began, as Mr. Jonson answered to a mailed paper by Mr. Keele in July, 2006. Now it is their common intention to let all the NPA members take part of their debate.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
For almost one year ago the two NPA participants Mr. James Keele and Mr. Jan Olof Jonson, both Master of Science Electric Engineers, performed an open E-mail debate before a part of the NPA members, about the SRT Theory of Electromagnetics for Moving Charges. The debate began, as Mr. Jonson answered to a mailed paper by Mr. Keele in July, 2006. Now it is their common intention to let all the NPA members take part of their debate.
 
[[Category:Scientific Paper|jonson-keele debate]]

Latest revision as of 09:27, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleThe Jonson-Keele Debate
Author(s)Jan Olof Jonson
Published2007
JournalProceedings of the NPA
Volume4
Number1
Pages96

Abstract

For almost one year ago the two NPA participants Mr. James Keele and Mr. Jan Olof Jonson, both Master of Science Electric Engineers, performed an open E-mail debate before a part of the NPA members, about the SRT Theory of Electromagnetics for Moving Charges. The debate began, as Mr. Jonson answered to a mailed paper by Mr. Keele in July, 2006. Now it is their common intention to let all the NPA members take part of their debate.