Commentary on Sub-Quantum Physics: Difference between revisions
Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| published = 2010 | | published = 2010 | ||
| journal = [[Foundations of Science]] | | journal = [[Foundations of Science]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 13 | ||
| number = | | number = 3 | ||
| num_pages = 6 | | num_pages = 6 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:23, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Commentary on Sub-Quantum Physics |
| Read in full | Link to paper (Internet Archive) |
| Author(s) | David L Bergman |
| Keywords | Sub-Quantum Physics, Quantum Physics |
| Published | 2010 |
| Journal | Foundations of Science |
| Volume | 13 |
| Number | 3 |
| No. of pages | 6 |
Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)
Abstract
All attempts to reconcile quantum theory with true science will be futile because the underlying assumptions and methods are different. The underlying dogma of quantum theory is its denial of causality and assertion of randomness. Those who believe truth is tested by the law of non-contradiction cannot accept the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle or models (such as Sub-Quantum Physics) that assume the HUP.