Jump to content

About the Arrow of Time: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6629.pdf Link to paper]
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6629.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Cynthia Kolb Whitney]]
| author = [[Cynthia Kolb Whitney]]
| keywords = time, special relativity theory, speed
| published = 2012
| published = 2012
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[9]]
| volume = 9
| num_pages = 6
| num_pages = 6
| pages = 655-660
| pages = 655-660

Latest revision as of 09:23, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleAbout the Arrow of Time
Read in fullLink to paper
Author(s)Cynthia Kolb Whitney
Keywordstime, special relativity theory, speed
Published2012
JournalProceedings of the NPA
Volume9
No. of pages6
Pages655-660

Read the full paper here

Abstract

becomes an inevitable part of the mathematical description of all systems. That point is the appearance of Maxwell?s four coupled field equations. Very early, the four coupled field equations were inserted one into another to produce two uncoupled wave equations. This manipulation revealed the finite wave propagation speed . Compared to Newtonian physics, the finite wave propagation speed was something new in Physics. But it wasn't then tied into the development of irreversibility, because the two wave equations themselves are time reversal invariant. However, the original coupled field equations are not time reversal invariant, and from that fact there flows an important story that has implications concerning the status we should attribute to Einstein's Special Relativity Theory (SRT).