Jump to content

"Einstein Reconsidered" (Re: an Infinite Energy Discussion): Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox paper
{{Infobox paper
| title = ?Einstein Reconsidered? (Re: an Infinite Energy Discussion)
| title = "Einstein Reconsidered" (Re: an Infinite Energy Discussion)
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_825.pdf Link to paper]
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_825.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Vyacheslav N Streltsov]]
| author = [[Vyacheslav N Streltsov]]
| keywords = [[special relativity]], [[general relativity]], [[Lorentz]], [[Poincare]], [[Einstein]], [[Minkowski]], [[Infinite Energy.]]
| keywords = [[special relativity]], [[general relativity]], [[Lorentz]], [[Poincare]], [[Einstein]], [[Minkowski]], [[Infinite Energy.]]
| published = 2003
| published = 2003
| volume = [[4]]
| volume = 4
| number = [[6]]
| number = 6
| num_pages = 2
| num_pages = 2
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 09:22, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
Title"Einstein Reconsidered" (Re: an Infinite Energy Discussion)
Read in fullLink to paper
Author(s)Vyacheslav N Streltsov
Keywordsspecial relativity, general relativity, Lorentz, Poincare, Einstein, Minkowski, Infinite Energy.
Published2003
Volume4
Number6
No. of pages2

Read the full paper here

Abstract

An opinion is expressed that special relativity would be named the Lorentz-Poincare-Einstein-Minkowski relativity theory. It is noted again that these two known conclusions of general relativity contradict the results of experiments with atomic clocks and each other.