Einsteinian and Quantum-Mechanical Observers: Difference between revisions
Add to Category:Quantum Theory |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| published = 1993 | | published = 1993 | ||
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | | journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 4 | ||
| number = | | number = 2 | ||
| pages = 29-31 | | pages = 29-31 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
[[Category:Quantum Theory]] | [[Category:Quantum Theory]] | ||
[[Category:Electromagnetism]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:21, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Einsteinian and Quantum-Mechanical Observers |
| Author(s) | Howard C Hayden |
| Keywords | Einstein's special relativity theory, Maxwell's Equations, Quantum Electrodynamics |
| Published | 1993 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 29-31 |
Abstract
One of the highly touted successes of modern physics is Einstein's special telativity theory (SRT), of which the Lorentz transformations are an essential ingredient. Another is Quantum Electrodynamics (QED), in which Maxwell's Equations are obviously important. It happens that Maxwell's equations automatically are consistent with the Lorentz transformation equations, yet there is, as yet, no successful theory incorporating the features of both SRT and QED. The present paper is not an attempt to bridge the gap, but rather to point out the inherent inconsistency between the two theories.