Jump to content

Manhattan or Kyoto: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox paper
{{Infobox paper
| title = Manhattan or Kyoto
| title = Manhattan or Kyoto
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20210323170710/http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue77/manhattan.html Link to paper (Internet Archive)]
| author = [[Peter Graneau]]
| author = [[Peter Graneau]]
| published = 2008
| published = 2008
| journal = [[Infinite Energy]]
| journal = [[Infinite Energy]]
| volume = [[14]]
| volume = 14
| number = [[77]]
| number = 77
| pages = 8-11
| pages = 8-11
}}
}}
'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20210323170710/http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue77/manhattan.html here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)''


==Abstract==
==Abstract==
Line 15: Line 18:
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">    In advance of the G8 summit held in Germany last month, U.S. President George Bush reiterated his view that to tackle global climate change is through technology, rather than by regulating emissions of green house gases. . . He is not alone in this view. Indeed political leaders of all persuasions, including U.S. Senators Hillary Clinton and Charles Schumer, as well as many scientists, are arguing that global warming can only be solved through a crash research and development programme similar to the Manhattan or Apollo projects.
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">    In advance of the G8 summit held in Germany last month, U.S. President George Bush reiterated his view that to tackle global climate change is through technology, rather than by regulating emissions of green house gases. . . He is not alone in this view. Indeed political leaders of all persuasions, including U.S. Senators Hillary Clinton and Charles Schumer, as well as many scientists, are arguing that global warming can only be solved through a crash research and development programme similar to the Manhattan or Apollo projects.


</blockquote>[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
</blockquote>
 
[[Category:Scientific Paper|manhattan kyoto]]

Latest revision as of 09:20, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleManhattan or Kyoto
Read in fullLink to paper (Internet Archive)
Author(s)Peter Graneau
Published2008
JournalInfinite Energy
Volume14
Number77
Pages8-11

Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)

Abstract

In the July 2007 issue of the journal Physics World, Chi-Jen Yang, a prominent member of the International Affairs Department of Princeton University, wrote about tackling global climate change under the headline "Manhattan versus Kyoto." (Physics World is the membership journal of the British Institute of Physics.) The first paragraph of Yang's article reads:

In advance of the G8 summit held in Germany last month, U.S. President George Bush reiterated his view that to tackle global climate change is through technology, rather than by regulating emissions of green house gases. . . He is not alone in this view. Indeed political leaders of all persuasions, including U.S. Senators Hillary Clinton and Charles Schumer, as well as many scientists, are arguing that global warming can only be solved through a crash research and development programme similar to the Manhattan or Apollo projects.