Zero Mass Loss Thruster Devices: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| published = 1992 | | published = 1992 | ||
| journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]] | | journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]] | ||
| number = | | number = 7 | ||
| pages = 26-32 | | pages = 26-32 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|zero mass loss thruster devices]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|zero mass loss thruster devices]] | ||
[[Category:Propulsion]] | |||
Revision as of 09:20, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Zero Mass Loss Thruster Devices |
| Author(s) | Paul M Brown |
| Keywords | Newton?s laws, phased pulses, reaction mass, reactionless propulsion, velocity of force |
| Published | 1992 |
| Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
| Number | 7 |
| Pages | 26-32 |
Abstract
Mechanical devices are often described which claim to produce a net directional thrust from motion confined within the device. Thus far, no such device is known to have accomplished this claim without some reaction force transfer (usually of a viscous or frictional nature) to the external environment. Paul Brown presents examples of arguments sometimes used to justify the mechanical production of net thrust.