Jump to content

Zero Mass Loss Thruster Devices: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| published = 1992
| published = 1992
| journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]]
| journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]]
| number = [[7]]
| number = 7
| pages = 26-32
| pages = 26-32
}}
}}
Line 11: Line 11:
==Abstract==
==Abstract==


Mechanical devices are often described which claim to produce a net directional thrust from motion confined within the device. Thus far, no such device is known to have accomplished this claim without some reaction force transfer (usually of a viscous or frictional nature) to the external environment. Paul Brown presents examples of arguments sometimes used to justify the mechanical production of net thrust.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
Mechanical devices are often described which claim to produce a net directional thrust from motion confined within the device. Thus far, no such device is known to have accomplished this claim without some reaction force transfer (usually of a viscous or frictional nature) to the external environment. Paul Brown presents examples of arguments sometimes used to justify the mechanical production of net thrust.
 
[[Category:Scientific Paper|zero mass loss thruster devices]]
 
[[Category:Propulsion]]

Latest revision as of 09:20, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleZero Mass Loss Thruster Devices
Author(s)Paul M Brown
KeywordsNewton?s laws, phased pulses, reaction mass, reactionless propulsion, velocity of force
Published1992
JournalElectric Spacecraft Journal
Number7
Pages26-32

Abstract

Mechanical devices are often described which claim to produce a net directional thrust from motion confined within the device. Thus far, no such device is known to have accomplished this claim without some reaction force transfer (usually of a viscous or frictional nature) to the external environment. Paul Brown presents examples of arguments sometimes used to justify the mechanical production of net thrust.