Jump to content

Charged Particle Oscillating Near a Capacitor: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| published = 1999
| published = 1999
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| volume = [[10]]
| volume = 10
| number = [[6]]
| number = 6
| pages = 103-105
| pages = 103-105
}}
}}
Line 12: Line 12:
==Abstract==
==Abstract==


We study the oscillation of a charged particle near a capacitor in four different models: Classical me-chanics, Weber's electrodynamics plus classical mechanics, relativistic mechanics, and Weber's electrodynamics plus the mechanics of Erwin Schr?dinger.  We show that only the third and fourth models yield physically reasonable results.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
We study the oscillation of a charged particle near a capacitor in four different models: Classical me-chanics, Weber's electrodynamics plus classical mechanics, relativistic mechanics, and Weber's electrodynamics plus the mechanics of Erwin Schr?dinger.  We show that only the third and fourth models yield physically reasonable results.


[[Category:Relativity]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|charged particle oscillating near capacitor]]
 
[[Category:Relativity|charged particle oscillating near capacitor]]

Latest revision as of 09:19, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleCharged Particle Oscillating Near a Capacitor
Author(s)Andre K T Assis
KeywordsWeber's electrodynamics, Schr?dinger's mechanics, theory of relativity, potential dependent inertial mass
Published1999
JournalGalilean Electrodynamics
Volume10
Number6
Pages103-105

Abstract

We study the oscillation of a charged particle near a capacitor in four different models: Classical me-chanics, Weber's electrodynamics plus classical mechanics, relativistic mechanics, and Weber's electrodynamics plus the mechanics of Erwin Schr?dinger. We show that only the third and fourth models yield physically reasonable results.