Criteria for the Study of Natural Philosophy: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| published = 2007 | | published = 2007 | ||
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]] | | journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 4 | ||
| number = | | number = 2 | ||
| pages = 242-244 | | pages = 242-244 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
What type of holor most perfectly describes each physical concept employed? Is each concept best represented by: a scalar, a complex number, a vector, a matrix, a tensor, or a new type of holor? | What type of holor most perfectly describes each physical concept employed? Is each concept best represented by: a scalar, a complex number, a vector, a matrix, a tensor, or a new type of holor? | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|criteria study natural philosophy]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:18, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Criteria for the Study of Natural Philosophy |
| Author(s) | Domina Eberle Spencer |
| Published | 2007 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 242-244 |
Abstract
The study of any branch of Natural Philosophy should be based on:
- A clear statement of the physical postulates on which the branch of natural philosophy to be studied is based
- A careful study of the optimum mathematical representation of each physical concept to be employed.
What type of holor most perfectly describes each physical concept employed? Is each concept best represented by: a scalar, a complex number, a vector, a matrix, a tensor, or a new type of holor?