Jump to content

Revisiting the Ives-Stillwell Experiment: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| title = Revisiting the Ives-Stillwell Experiment
| title = Revisiting the Ives-Stillwell Experiment
| author = [[Steven Bryant]]
| author = [[Steven Bryant]]
| keywords = special relativity theory, wavelength, SRT
| published = 2008
| published = 2008
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| volume = [[19]]
| volume = 19
| number = [[4]]
| number = 4
| pages = 75-78
| pages = 75-78
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 09:18, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleRevisiting the Ives-Stillwell Experiment
Author(s)Steven Bryant
Keywordsspecial relativity theory, wavelength, SRT
Published2008
JournalGalilean Electrodynamics
Volume19
Number4
Pages75-78

Abstract

Special Relativity Theory (SRT) is one theory that accurately explains the results of the Ives-Stillwell atomic clock experiment. SRT has been challenged on mathematical grounds following the discovery of inconsistencies in the derivation of the transformation equations. The model of Complete and Incomplete Coordinate Systems (CICS) corrects the mathematical and theoretical problems with SRT, and defines a set of equations for oscillating waves in moving systems. Here we show that the CICS model offers better predictive capabilities than SRT in evaluating the Ives-Stillwell atomic clock experiment, as measured by the amount of error between the predicted and actual results. Importantly, this finding supports the use of one-half a wavelength in the CICS equations to account for the bi-directional nature of wavelength.