Jump to content

Causality in Kaon Decays: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5308.pdf Link to paper]
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5308.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Tom Love]]
| author = [[Tom Love]]
| keywords = causality, quantum mechanics
| published = 2010
| published = 2010
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[7]]
| volume = 7
| num_pages = 1
| num_pages = 1
| pages = 302
| pages = 302

Latest revision as of 09:17, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleCausality in Kaon Decays
Read in fullLink to paper
Author(s)Tom Love
Keywordscausality, quantum mechanics
Published2010
JournalProceedings of the NPA
Volume7
No. of pages1
Pages302

Read the full paper here

Abstract

The question we want to analyze is described by Branco, Lavoura and Silva: There is no other particle with equal mass. Therefore, KL must be its own antiparticle. It decays both to Pi+eNue and to the C-conjugate mode Pie+Nue. However, it decays slightly less often to the first than to the second mode. This fact unequivocally establishes both C violation and CP violation.

There is an unstated assumption in their statement: the decays of the kaon are internal (independent of the background) and acausal (they have no cause). These assumptions come from standard quantum mechanics. We show that there is a cause for their decay and there is neither C violation nor CP violation in the decays of the kaon. The asymmetry in the decays is due to the asymmetry of the background, not an inherent difference.