Somme Remarks About Starlight Aberration: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = Somme Remarks About Starlight Aberration | | title = Somme Remarks About Starlight Aberration | ||
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20100619085145/http://www.wbabin.net/physics/maximo2.pdf Link to paper (Internet Archive)] | |||
| author = [[Roald C Maximo]] | | author = [[Roald C Maximo]] | ||
| keywords = starlight aberration, Special Theory of Relativity, Lorentz transformation, Sagnac effect | |||
| published = 2010 | | published = 2010 | ||
| journal = [[General Science Journal]] | | journal = [[General Science Journal]] | ||
| num_pages = 2 | | num_pages = 2 | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20100619085145/http://www.wbabin.net/physics/maximo2.pdf here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)'' | |||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Many physicists still do not accept the obvious conclusion that (c + v) and (c - v) are valid solutions when applied to moving observers. There are actually well known experimental proofs to validate those expressions. Besides the Sagnac effect, one experiment that has been hidden and given no publicity was a measurement of the orbital periods of the Jovian satellite (Io) performed by Ole C. R?mer that shows just such a velocity composition as the Earth approaches the planet or recedes in its orbit. [1] But, perhaps due to the pervading lato sensu interpretation of the second postulate of the Special Theory of Relativity in connection with the currently generalized opinion that any physical theory, to be valid, must conform to the TR, many physicists are reluctant to accept it. Whenever such a situation arises, they are eager to draw the Lorentz transformation from their pockets and apply it in some way to alleviate the discomfort.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | Many physicists still do not accept the obvious conclusion that (c + v) and (c - v) are valid solutions when applied to moving observers. There are actually well known experimental proofs to validate those expressions. Besides the Sagnac effect, one experiment that has been hidden and given no publicity was a measurement of the orbital periods of the Jovian satellite (Io) performed by Ole C. R?mer that shows just such a velocity composition as the Earth approaches the planet or recedes in its orbit. [1] But, perhaps due to the pervading lato sensu interpretation of the second postulate of the Special Theory of Relativity in connection with the currently generalized opinion that any physical theory, to be valid, must conform to the TR, many physicists are reluctant to accept it. Whenever such a situation arises, they are eager to draw the Lorentz transformation from their pockets and apply it in some way to alleviate the discomfort. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|somme remarks starlight aberration]] | |||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity|somme remarks starlight aberration]] | ||
Latest revision as of 07:33, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Somme Remarks About Starlight Aberration |
| Read in full | Link to paper (Internet Archive) |
| Author(s) | Roald C Maximo |
| Keywords | starlight aberration, Special Theory of Relativity, Lorentz transformation, Sagnac effect |
| Published | 2010 |
| Journal | General Science Journal |
| No. of pages | 2 |
Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)
Abstract
Many physicists still do not accept the obvious conclusion that (c + v) and (c - v) are valid solutions when applied to moving observers. There are actually well known experimental proofs to validate those expressions. Besides the Sagnac effect, one experiment that has been hidden and given no publicity was a measurement of the orbital periods of the Jovian satellite (Io) performed by Ole C. R?mer that shows just such a velocity composition as the Earth approaches the planet or recedes in its orbit. [1] But, perhaps due to the pervading lato sensu interpretation of the second postulate of the Special Theory of Relativity in connection with the currently generalized opinion that any physical theory, to be valid, must conform to the TR, many physicists are reluctant to accept it. Whenever such a situation arises, they are eager to draw the Lorentz transformation from their pockets and apply it in some way to alleviate the discomfort.