Jump to content

Rotating Magnetic Fields in the Electric Sea: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox paper
{{Infobox paper
| title = Rotating Magnetic Fields in the Electric Sea
| title = Rotating Magnetic Fields in the Electric Sea
| url = [http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-Astrophysics/Download/207 Link to paper]
| author = [[David Tombe]]
| author = [[David Tombe]]
| keywords = magnetic fields, magnetic field, Lorentz force, Faraday, real
| published = 2007
| published = 2007
| journal = [[General Science Journal]]
| journal = [[General Science Journal]]
| num_pages = 3
| num_pages = 3
}}
}}
'''Read the full paper''' [http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-Astrophysics/Download/207 here]


==Abstract==
==Abstract==
Line 11: Line 15:
When a magnet is rotated, the '''v'''X'''B''' component of the Lorentz force will not be invoked on a nearby stationary test particle. The ??'''A'''/??t component of the Lorentz force will however be invoked provided that the axis of rotation does not coincide with the magnetic axis. Faraday?fs interpretation of the null electromagnetic effect for the special case of a magnet rotating on its magnetic axis was that the magnetic field does not rotate with it. In this respect Faraday was correct, but he missed out on the real significance of the scenario. The real significance is that the '''v'''X'''B''' force is not invoked by a rotating magnet irrespective of whether or not the magnetic field is caused to rotate, and hence the velocity term '''v''' cannot be considered to be measured relative to the magnetic field. The velocity term in '''v'''X'''B''' must be measured relative to something else, and since '''v''' is zero in the case scenario, that something else is clearly not rotating when a magnet rotates on ANY axis.   
When a magnet is rotated, the '''v'''X'''B''' component of the Lorentz force will not be invoked on a nearby stationary test particle. The ??'''A'''/??t component of the Lorentz force will however be invoked provided that the axis of rotation does not coincide with the magnetic axis. Faraday?fs interpretation of the null electromagnetic effect for the special case of a magnet rotating on its magnetic axis was that the magnetic field does not rotate with it. In this respect Faraday was correct, but he missed out on the real significance of the scenario. The real significance is that the '''v'''X'''B''' force is not invoked by a rotating magnet irrespective of whether or not the magnetic field is caused to rotate, and hence the velocity term '''v''' cannot be considered to be measured relative to the magnetic field. The velocity term in '''v'''X'''B''' must be measured relative to something else, and since '''v''' is zero in the case scenario, that something else is clearly not rotating when a magnet rotates on ANY axis.   


[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|rotating magnetic fields electric sea]]


[[Category:Aether]]
[[Category:Aether|rotating magnetic fields electric sea]]
[[Category:Electrodynamics]]
[[Category:Electrodynamics|rotating magnetic fields electric sea]]

Latest revision as of 07:29, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleRotating Magnetic Fields in the Electric Sea
Read in fullLink to paper
Author(s)David Tombe
Keywordsmagnetic fields, magnetic field, Lorentz force, Faraday, real
Published2007
JournalGeneral Science Journal
No. of pages3

Read the full paper here

Abstract

When a magnet is rotated, the vXB component of the Lorentz force will not be invoked on a nearby stationary test particle. The ??A/??t component of the Lorentz force will however be invoked provided that the axis of rotation does not coincide with the magnetic axis. Faraday?fs interpretation of the null electromagnetic effect for the special case of a magnet rotating on its magnetic axis was that the magnetic field does not rotate with it. In this respect Faraday was correct, but he missed out on the real significance of the scenario. The real significance is that the vXB force is not invoked by a rotating magnet irrespective of whether or not the magnetic field is caused to rotate, and hence the velocity term v cannot be considered to be measured relative to the magnetic field. The velocity term in vXB must be measured relative to something else, and since v is zero in the case scenario, that something else is clearly not rotating when a magnet rotates on ANY axis.