Mass Rotation Controls Orbiting: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_paperlink_7070.doc Link to paper] | | url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_paperlink_7070.doc Link to paper] | ||
| author = [[Paul Schroeder]] | | author = [[Paul Schroeder]] | ||
| keywords = Rotation, mass | |||
| published = 2013 | | published = 2013 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
<span style="font-family: Book Antiqua; font-size: x-small;">Prior to the development of physics as a science it was sufficient to have motion that offsets a perpendicular gravitational force and continues forever.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The total absence of any friction could be assigned to the ‘void’ of space.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>But perpetual motion and empty space are now seen as fallacies.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Continuous motion needs a driving force for impetus.</span> | <span style="font-family: Book Antiqua; font-size: x-small;">Prior to the development of physics as a science it was sufficient to have motion that offsets a perpendicular gravitational force and continues forever.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The total absence of any friction could be assigned to the ‘void’ of space.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>But perpetual motion and empty space are now seen as fallacies.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Continuous motion needs a driving force for impetus.</span> | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|Scientific Paper]] | ||
[[Category:Gravity]] | [[Category:Gravity]] | ||
Latest revision as of 07:28, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Mass Rotation Controls Orbiting |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Paul Schroeder |
| Keywords | Rotation, mass |
| Published | 2013 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Prior to the development of physics as a science it was sufficient to have motion that offsets a perpendicular gravitational force and continues forever. The total absence of any friction could be assigned to the ‘void’ of space. But perpetual motion and empty space are now seen as fallacies. Continuous motion needs a driving force for impetus.