Critique to the Models of Nuclear Physics: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Add to Category:Nuclear Structure |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| author = [[Wladimir Guglinski]] | | author = [[Wladimir Guglinski]] | ||
| keywords = [[Nuclear Models]] | | keywords = [[Nuclear Models]] | ||
| pages = 123-135 | | pages = 123-135 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|critique models nuclear physics]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|critique models nuclear physics]] | ||
[[Category:Nuclear Structure]] | |||
Revision as of 09:46, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Critique to the Models of Nuclear Physics |
| Author(s) | Wladimir Guglinski |
| Keywords | Nuclear Models |
| Pages | 123-135 |
Abstract
Basically, there are four nuclear models in the Nuclear Physics. They are: Liquid Drop Model, Fermi Gas, Model of Layers, Collective Model. There are fundamental incompatibilities between these models, and we will analyze them face to the nuclear properties inferred by experiments. Herein it is shown:
- Fundamental incompatibilities between the current nuclear models.
- Insufficiency of strong nuclear force as the cause of nuclei aggregation.
- A new nuclear property unknown by current Nuclear Physics.
- Incompatibility between Gamow?s theory and the experiments.
- Gamow explained a paradox by the introduction of other paradox.
- The use of the laws of ethics in Quantum Mechanics.