The Failure of Quantum Mechanics: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Add to Category:Quantum Theory |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| keywords = [[Quantum Mechanics]] | | keywords = [[Quantum Mechanics]] | ||
| published = 1996 | | published = 1996 | ||
| pages = 381-394 | | pages = 381-394 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|failure quantum mechanics]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|failure quantum mechanics]] | ||
[[Category:Quantum Theory]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:43, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | The Failure of Quantum Mechanics |
| Author(s) | Paul Wesley |
| Keywords | Quantum Mechanics |
| Published | 1996 |
| Pages | 381-394 |
Abstract
The empirically correct classical quantum theory is briefly outlined for comparison with empirically impossible orthodox quantum mechanics: The de Broglie wave cannot represent a physical wave. A wave packet doe snot exist. A single particle wave does not exist. The operator approach fails. The ambiguous complex representation with imaginary number i = (-1 makes it impossible to fit initial and boundary conditions. The arbitrary quantum mechanical particle flux and density are not observed. Bound states cannot be motionless. The wave function is not a probability amplitude. The uncertainty principle with its huge uncertainties fails drastically. EPR demonstrate the failure of quantum mechanics. The quantum mechanical claim of instantaneous action at a distance without any physical mechanism involved is pure mysticism. Hidden variables are not necessary. Claims of experimentally violating Bell's inequality are fraudulent.