Moving Clock Does not Run Slow: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Add to Category:Time |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| keywords = [[special relativity]], [[clocks]], [[time]] | | keywords = [[special relativity]], [[clocks]], [[time]] | ||
| published = 2009 | | published = 2009 | ||
| num_pages = 3 | | num_pages = 3 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
This note is not intended to show that the time dilation formula in special relativity is wrong. Instead, I will show that the formula has been misinterpreted. In particular, I will show that the time dilation formula does not imply a moving clock runs slower compared to a stationary clock. As a corollary, there is no twin paradox. | This note is not intended to show that the time dilation formula in special relativity is wrong. Instead, I will show that the formula has been misinterpreted. In particular, I will show that the time dilation formula does not imply a moving clock runs slower compared to a stationary clock. As a corollary, there is no twin paradox. | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|moving clock does run slow]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity|moving clock does run slow]] | |||
[[Category:Time]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:42, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Moving Clock Does not Run Slow |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Boon Leong Lan |
| Keywords | special relativity, clocks, time |
| Published | 2009 |
| No. of pages | 3 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This note is not intended to show that the time dilation formula in special relativity is wrong. Instead, I will show that the formula has been misinterpreted. In particular, I will show that the time dilation formula does not imply a moving clock runs slower compared to a stationary clock. As a corollary, there is no twin paradox.