Jump to content

Physics without Paradoxes: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
Add to Category:Light
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
The number of paradoxes in theoretical physics is large. This means that we have reason to suspect that experiments have been interpreted in error long time ago. The behavior of light and ether has been misunderstood. This has caused wrong interpretations of stellar aberration, Michelson and Morley's tests and of Einstein's so called light clock. If we instead regard Sagnac effect, global positioning system (GPS), Pioneer anomaly, gravitational anomalies during solar eclipses and the behavior of atomic clocks, than we get a very different view of light and ether. We find that we do not need the theory of relativity, and not the quanta of light either. We also find that we can explain gravity. The paradoxes disappear.
The number of paradoxes in theoretical physics is large. This means that we have reason to suspect that experiments have been interpreted in error long time ago. The behavior of light and ether has been misunderstood. This has caused wrong interpretations of stellar aberration, Michelson and Morley's tests and of Einstein's so called light clock. If we instead regard Sagnac effect, global positioning system (GPS), Pioneer anomaly, gravitational anomalies during solar eclipses and the behavior of atomic clocks, than we get a very different view of light and ether. We find that we do not need the theory of relativity, and not the quanta of light either. We also find that we can explain gravity. The paradoxes disappear.


[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|Scientific Paper]]


[[Category:Gravity]]
[[Category:Gravity]]
Line 20: Line 20:
[[Category:Relativity]]
[[Category:Relativity]]
[[Category:Philosophy]]
[[Category:Philosophy]]
[[Category:Light]]

Latest revision as of 09:40, 20 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitlePhysics without Paradoxes
Read in fullLink to paper
Author(s)John-Erik Persson
Keywordslight, relativity, stellar aberration, ether, gravity, quantization.
Published2016
No. of pages4

Read the full paper here

Abstract

The number of paradoxes in theoretical physics is large. This means that we have reason to suspect that experiments have been interpreted in error long time ago. The behavior of light and ether has been misunderstood. This has caused wrong interpretations of stellar aberration, Michelson and Morley's tests and of Einstein's so called light clock. If we instead regard Sagnac effect, global positioning system (GPS), Pioneer anomaly, gravitational anomalies during solar eclipses and the behavior of atomic clocks, than we get a very different view of light and ether. We find that we do not need the theory of relativity, and not the quanta of light either. We also find that we can explain gravity. The paradoxes disappear.