Compton Effect Obeys Newton's Law: Difference between revisions
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = Compton Effect Obeys Newton | | title = Compton Effect Obeys Newton's Law | ||
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5920.pdf Link to paper] | | url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5920.pdf Link to paper] | ||
| author = [[Qing Zeng]] | | author = [[Qing Zeng]] | ||
Revision as of 23:38, 19 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Compton Effect Obeys Newton's Law |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Qing Zeng |
| Keywords | Compton, scattering, Newton, mass-energy relation |
| Published | 2010 |
| No. of pages | 7 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
In 1923, Compton used Planck quantum hypothesis and mass-energy transformation formula to explain X-ray?s scattering effect. This article uses Planck quantum hypothesis and Newton's Law and gets the same conclusion. Meanwhile, Chinese professor Wu Youxun made an experiment in 1926 and the conclusion anastomosed. Through analysis, we can see that Newton's Law is authoritative and comprehensive, but Einstein?s mass-energy transformation formula has some defects. From this point of view, this article is challenging the relativity.