Practicism: The Unifying Body of Understanding for Everything: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| author = [[Wilfred T M Berendsen]] | | author = [[Wilfred T M Berendsen]] | ||
| published = 2011 | | published = 2011 | ||
| num_pages = 3 | | num_pages = 3 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|practicism unifying body understanding]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|practicism unifying body understanding]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity|practicism unifying body understanding]] | ||
Revision as of 19:40, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Practicism: The Unifying Body of Understanding for Everything |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Wilfred T M Berendsen |
| Published | 2011 |
| No. of pages | 3 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Our current sciences and practices are largely based on the underlying assumptions, structures and nature of philosophy. Consequently both Aristotle and logician Charles Sanders Peirce organized the sciences based on hierarchical differentiations. Metaphysics also is mostly based on these hierarchies, with one leading concept dictating the meaning of all others. Thus, our current sciences are still reductionist and partial, mostly because people concentrate on understanding more and more of a relatively ?small? part of the whole. Then, because of the functional differentiations and the underlying structure of our current sciences and practices, real true great understandings at even higher levels can never be reached. This paper will try to explain an alternative understanding for everything by means of my Phronesis Meta-semeiotics.