Experimental Evidence Against Repulsion in Hollow Spherical Shells: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| title = Experimental Evidence Against Repulsion in Hollow Spherical Shells | | title = Experimental Evidence Against Repulsion in Hollow Spherical Shells | ||
| author = [[Thomas D Martin]] | | author = [[Thomas D Martin]] | ||
| num_pages = 13 | | num_pages = 13 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|experimental evidence repulsion hollow spherical shells]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|experimental evidence repulsion hollow spherical shells]] | ||
[[Category:Gravity]] | [[Category:Gravity|experimental evidence repulsion hollow spherical shells]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:39, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Experimental Evidence Against Repulsion in Hollow Spherical Shells |
| Author(s) | Thomas D Martin |
| No. of pages | 13 |
Abstract
We have performed a simple version of the hollow shell Cavendish experiment. We were unable to detect the characteristic repulsive force which is logically implied when one assumes the boundary condition of continuity of flow across material interfaces in spatial flow theories of gravity. We conclude that this boundary condition is not in agreement with physical reality (rather than taking the much stronger position that spatial flow theories are necessarily wrong).