Real and Apparent Effects in Special Relativity: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| keywords = [[special relativity]], [[synchronization]] | | keywords = [[special relativity]], [[synchronization]] | ||
| published = 1989 | | published = 1989 | ||
| pages = 230-236 | | pages = 230-236 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
The roles played by real and apparent effects in Special Relativity are clarified. It is found that the observed effects of slowing down of moving clocks and shortening of moving rods in general are composed of two parts; a real part due to the movement with respect to the privileged frame and an apparent part due to the chosen synchronization. The question about the measurability of the one-way velocity of light is discussed. It is found that this question has no meaning within the Einsteinian interpretation of Special Relativity, whereas it within the Lorentzian interpretation is meaningful. Its answer is probably 'no', however, since a positive answer would mean that Poincare's principle about the impossibility to measure absolute velocities would be falsified. | The roles played by real and apparent effects in Special Relativity are clarified. It is found that the observed effects of slowing down of moving clocks and shortening of moving rods in general are composed of two parts; a real part due to the movement with respect to the privileged frame and an apparent part due to the chosen synchronization. The question about the measurability of the one-way velocity of light is discussed. It is found that this question has no meaning within the Einsteinian interpretation of Special Relativity, whereas it within the Lorentzian interpretation is meaningful. Its answer is probably 'no', however, since a positive answer would mean that Poincare's principle about the impossibility to measure absolute velocities would be falsified. | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|real apparent effects special relativity]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity|real apparent effects special relativity]] | |||
Latest revision as of 19:35, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Real and Apparent Effects in Special Relativity |
| Author(s) | Torgny Sj?din |
| Keywords | special relativity, synchronization |
| Published | 1989 |
| Pages | 230-236 |
Abstract
The roles played by real and apparent effects in Special Relativity are clarified. It is found that the observed effects of slowing down of moving clocks and shortening of moving rods in general are composed of two parts; a real part due to the movement with respect to the privileged frame and an apparent part due to the chosen synchronization. The question about the measurability of the one-way velocity of light is discussed. It is found that this question has no meaning within the Einsteinian interpretation of Special Relativity, whereas it within the Lorentzian interpretation is meaningful. Its answer is probably 'no', however, since a positive answer would mean that Poincare's principle about the impossibility to measure absolute velocities would be falsified.