Central Body Rotation Drives Orbital Revolutions: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| author = [[Paul Schroeder]] | | author = [[Paul Schroeder]] | ||
| published = 2012 | | published = 2012 | ||
| num_pages = 7 | | num_pages = 7 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Prior to the development of physics as a science it was sufficient to have motion that offsets a perpendicular gravitational force and continues forever. The total absence of any friction could be assigned to the ?void' of space. But perpetual motion and empty space are now seen as fallacies. Continuous motion needs a driving force for impetus. | Prior to the development of physics as a science it was sufficient to have motion that offsets a perpendicular gravitational force and continues forever. The total absence of any friction could be assigned to the ?void' of space. But perpetual motion and empty space are now seen as fallacies. Continuous motion needs a driving force for impetus. | ||
[[Category:Gravity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|central body rotation drives orbital revolutions]] | ||
[[Category:Gravity|central body rotation drives orbital revolutions]] | |||
Latest revision as of 19:33, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Central Body Rotation Drives Orbital Revolutions |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Paul Schroeder |
| Published | 2012 |
| No. of pages | 7 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Prior to the development of physics as a science it was sufficient to have motion that offsets a perpendicular gravitational force and continues forever. The total absence of any friction could be assigned to the ?void' of space. But perpetual motion and empty space are now seen as fallacies. Continuous motion needs a driving force for impetus.