Criticism on the Foundations of Relativity: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| keywords = [[Relativity]] | | keywords = [[Relativity]] | ||
| published = 1996 | | published = 1996 | ||
| pages = 315-323 | | pages = 315-323 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
Inconsistencies between a corpuscular nature of light and some observations are well known. However, they disappear when it is assumed that a photon is not emitted inside the light source bur in a medium at rest. | Inconsistencies between a corpuscular nature of light and some observations are well known. However, they disappear when it is assumed that a photon is not emitted inside the light source bur in a medium at rest. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|criticism foundations relativity]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity|criticism foundations relativity]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:30, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Criticism on the Foundations of Relativity |
| Author(s) | Jean-Jacques Gruffat |
| Keywords | Relativity |
| Published | 1996 |
| Pages | 315-323 |
Abstract
It is shown that the Lorentz assumption of a length contraction with a ratio (1-B2)1/2 in the movement direction of moving bodies is not the only one which can explain the Michelson-Morley experiment within its usual interpretation.
Inconsistencies between a corpuscular nature of light and some observations are well known. However, they disappear when it is assumed that a photon is not emitted inside the light source bur in a medium at rest.