A Brief Reexamination of Relativity: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| keywords = [[Relativity]] | | keywords = [[Relativity]] | ||
| published = 1997 | | published = 1997 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|brief reexamination relativity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|brief reexamination relativity]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity|brief reexamination relativity]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:27, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | A Brief Reexamination of Relativity |
| Author(s) | Shao-Zhi Xu |
| Keywords | Relativity |
| Published | 1997 |
Abstract
The paper confirms that the Einstein-Lorentz Group is a null-set 1 and will offer mathematical and physical facts to show that: (a) The so called 4-D interval invariance is irrelevant to the second postulate of relativity; (b) It is worthless when the Lorentz transformation meets the 4-D invariance; (c) The Lorentz transformation contradicts itself and is unqualified as a coordinate transformation; (d) The deSitter argument has an intrinsic gap and cannot serve as evidence that the velocity of light is independent of the speed of the source; (e) The second principle of relativity has no empirical evidence. It is a glaring error to ascribe the electrodynamics of moving bodies to any observer's observation.