On Lorentz Transformation: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| keywords = [[Lorentz Transformation]], [[Speical Relativity]], [[infinitesimals]] | | keywords = [[Lorentz Transformation]], [[Speical Relativity]], [[infinitesimals]] | ||
| published = 2005 | | published = 2005 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
The invalidity of the finite Lorentz transformation is suggested. A frequent error, preserved since the original works of Lorentz, Minkowski and Einstein, is that the Lorentz transformations are written as if they referred to finite magnitudes, when in fact they should refer to infinitesimals. To this error can be traced most of the paradoxes that pervade Special Relativity. | The invalidity of the finite Lorentz transformation is suggested. A frequent error, preserved since the original works of Lorentz, Minkowski and Einstein, is that the Lorentz transformations are written as if they referred to finite magnitudes, when in fact they should refer to infinitesimals. To this error can be traced most of the paradoxes that pervade Special Relativity. | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|lorentz transformation]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity|lorentz transformation]] | |||
Latest revision as of 19:27, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | On Lorentz Transformation |
| Author(s) | Diego Jos? Arturo Sa |
| Keywords | Lorentz Transformation, Speical Relativity, infinitesimals |
| Published | 2005 |
Abstract
The invalidity of the finite Lorentz transformation is suggested. A frequent error, preserved since the original works of Lorentz, Minkowski and Einstein, is that the Lorentz transformations are written as if they referred to finite magnitudes, when in fact they should refer to infinitesimals. To this error can be traced most of the paradoxes that pervade Special Relativity.