Unified 'No Field' Theory and the Bohr Atom - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:18:42Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:18, 21 July 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\| published = 2003		\| published = 2003
	\| journal = [[Journal of New Energy]]		\| journal = [[Journal of New Energy]]
	\| volume = [[7]]		\| volume = 7
	\| number = [[3]]		\| number = 3
	\| num_pages = 6		\| num_pages = 6
	\| pages = 45-50		\| pages = 45-50

ClaudeBot: Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug

2026-07-20T03:35:36Z

Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:35, 19 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = Unified \'No Field\' Theory and the Bohr Atom		\| title = Unified 'No Field' Theory and the Bohr Atom
	\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_602.pdf Link to paper]		\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_602.pdf Link to paper]
	\| author = [[James Keele]]		\| author = [[James Keele]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T03:11:32Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:11, 1 January 2017
Line 20:		Line 20:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|unified 'no field ' theory bohr atom]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|unified 'no field ' theory bohr atom]]

	[[Category:Unified Theory]]		[[Category:Unified Theory\|unified 'no field ' theory bohr atom]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:35:15Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:35, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Writing in a recent issue of Galilean Electrodynamics, Osborne and Pope proposed, and to some extent demonstrated, that all forces are due to conservation of angular momentum, and not due to gravity, electrostatic, inertia, or other forces. The central idea is that material objects, neutral mass, and charged mass, when moving in a 'natural' orbit about another body, experience no forces. Also presented was the idea that orbits, and not rectilinear motions, are the natural motions of particles. While Pope and Osborne developed the idea somewhat at the macro and micro levels, the author of the present paper re-examines these ideas at the micro level in a slightly different manner, using the Bohr Atom. What is demonstrated is that the electrical forces associated with Coulomb's Law can be attributed to angular momentum or kinetic energy moments, instead of electric charges.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Writing in a recent issue of Galilean Electrodynamics, Osborne and Pope proposed, and to some extent demonstrated, that all forces are due to conservation of angular momentum, and not due to gravity, electrostatic, inertia, or other forces. The central idea is that material objects, neutral mass, and charged mass, when moving in a 'natural' orbit about another body, experience no forces. Also presented was the idea that orbits, and not rectilinear motions, are the natural motions of particles. While Pope and Osborne developed the idea somewhat at the macro and micro levels, the author of the present paper re-examines these ideas at the micro level in a slightly different manner, using the Bohr Atom. What is demonstrated is that the electrical forces associated with Coulomb's Law can be attributed to angular momentum or kinetic energy moments, instead of electric charges.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|unified 'no field ' theory bohr atom]]

	[[Category:Unified Theory]]		[[Category:Unified Theory]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T02:11:33Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Unified \'No Field\' Theory and the Bohr Atom
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_602.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[James Keele]]
| keywords = [[Coulomb's Law]], [[Natural Orbit]], [[Angular Momentum]]
| published = 2003
| journal = [[Journal of New Energy]]
| volume = [[7]]
| number = [[3]]
| num_pages = 6
| pages = 45-50
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_602.pdf here]

==Abstract==

Writing in a recent issue of Galilean Electrodynamics, Osborne and Pope proposed, and to some extent demonstrated, that all forces are due to conservation of angular momentum, and not due to gravity, electrostatic, inertia, or other forces. The central idea is that material objects, neutral mass, and charged mass, when moving in a 'natural' orbit about another body, experience no forces. Also presented was the idea that orbits, and not rectilinear motions, are the natural motions of particles. While Pope and Osborne developed the idea somewhat at the macro and micro levels, the author of the present paper re-examines these ideas at the micro level in a slightly different manner, using the Bohr Atom. What is demonstrated is that the electrical forces associated with Coulomb's Law can be attributed to angular momentum or kinetic energy moments, instead of electric charges.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Unified Theory]]