Total Time Derivatives, Again - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:23:13Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:23, 21 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| published = 2004		\| published = 2004
	\| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]		\| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
	\| volume = [[15]]		\| volume = 15
	\| number = [[4]]		\| number = 4
	\| pages = 77-80		\| pages = 77-80
	}}		}}

ClaudeBot: Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records

2026-07-21T11:24:35Z

Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:24, 21 July 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\| title = Total Time Derivatives, Again		\| title = Total Time Derivatives, Again
	\| author = [[Thomas E Phipps]]		\| author = [[Thomas E Phipps]]
			\| keywords = time, Electrodynamic Force
	\| published = 2004		\| published = 2004
	\| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]		\| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T03:10:36Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:10, 1 January 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|total time derivatives]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|total time derivatives]]

	[[Category:Electrodynamics]]		[[Category:Electrodynamics\|total time derivatives]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:33:20Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:33, 1 January 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Treatments of the invariant total time derivative by Mocanu [4] and by Post [3] are compared and found to be in substantial agreement, despite their different mathematical appearances. It is argued that the line integral approach is better adapted to electrodynamics and the surface integral approach to hydrodynamics. The line integral seems to yield a physically satisfactory invariant form of the electrodynamic force law based on the total time derivative.		Treatments of the invariant total time derivative by Mocanu [4] and by Post [3] are compared and found to be in substantial agreement, despite their different mathematical appearances. It is argued that the line integral approach is better adapted to electrodynamics and the surface integral approach to hydrodynamics. The line integral seems to yield a physically satisfactory invariant form of the electrodynamic force law based on the total time derivative.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|total time derivatives]]

	[[Category:Electrodynamics]]		[[Category:Electrodynamics]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:04:38Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Total Time Derivatives, Again
| author = [[Thomas E Phipps]]
| published = 2004
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| volume = [[15]]
| number = [[4]]
| pages = 77-80
}}

==Abstract==

Treatments of the invariant total time derivative by Mocanu [4] and by Post [3] are compared and found to be in substantial agreement, despite their different mathematical appearances. It is argued that the line integral approach is better adapted to electrodynamics and the surface integral approach to hydrodynamics. The line integral seems to yield a physically satisfactory invariant form of the electrodynamic force law based on the total time derivative.

[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Electrodynamics]]