The Top 50 Problems with the Big Bang - Revision history

ClaudeBot: Add to Category:Big Bang

2026-07-20T13:40:05Z

Add to Category:Big Bang

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:40, 20 July 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:
	[[Category:New Energy\|top problems with big bang]]		[[Category:New Energy\|top problems with big bang]]
	[[Category:Cosmology\|top problems with big bang]]		[[Category:Cosmology\|top problems with big bang]]

			[[Category:Big Bang]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T03:08:55Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:08, 1 January 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|top problems with big bang]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|top problems with big bang]]

	[[Category:New Energy]]		[[Category:New Energy\|top problems with big bang]]
	[[Category:Cosmology]]		[[Category:Cosmology\|top problems with big bang]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:29:35Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:29, 1 January 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	The Big Bang theory has never achieved a true prediction success in a situation where the theory was placed at risk of falsification before the results were known. It is instead a series of accommodations of existing observations aided by a variety of ad hoc helper hypotheses, the best known of which are ?dark matter? and ?dark energy?. A decade ago, a list of the top 10 problems with the theory seemed to encapsulate the situation. Since then, the list has had to be expanded twice. It should now be evident to objective minds that nothing about the Universe interpreted with the Big Bang theory is necessarily right, not even the most basic idea in it; namely, that the Universe is expanding. There are four major and many more minor replacement models that should be seriously considered. To get this message to the astronomical community, we are looking for additional authors and their associated institutions to put out a joint communiqu? in a major journal summarizing these points.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		The Big Bang theory has never achieved a true prediction success in a situation where the theory was placed at risk of falsification before the results were known. It is instead a series of accommodations of existing observations aided by a variety of ad hoc helper hypotheses, the best known of which are ?dark matter? and ?dark energy?. A decade ago, a list of the top 10 problems with the theory seemed to encapsulate the situation. Since then, the list has had to be expanded twice. It should now be evident to objective minds that nothing about the Universe interpreted with the Big Bang theory is necessarily right, not even the most basic idea in it; namely, that the Universe is expanding. There are four major and many more minor replacement models that should be seriously considered. To get this message to the astronomical community, we are looking for additional authors and their associated institutions to put out a joint communiqu? in a major journal summarizing these points.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|top problems with big bang]]

	[[Category:New Energy]]		[[Category:New Energy]]
	[[Category:Cosmology]]		[[Category:Cosmology]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T01:21:07Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = The Top 50 Problems with the Big Bang
| author = [[Tom Van Flandern]]
| keywords = [[Big Bang]], [[dark matter]], [[dark energy]]
| published = 2005
}}

==Abstract==

The Big Bang theory has never achieved a true prediction success in a situation where the theory was placed at risk of falsification before the results were known. It is instead a series of accommodations of existing observations aided by a variety of ad hoc helper hypotheses, the best known of which are ?dark matter? and ?dark energy?. A decade ago, a list of the top 10 problems with the theory seemed to encapsulate the situation. Since then, the list has had to be expanded twice. It should now be evident to objective minds that nothing about the Universe interpreted with the Big Bang theory is necessarily right, not even the most basic idea in it; namely, that the Universe is expanding. There are four major and many more minor replacement models that should be seriously considered. To get this message to the astronomical community, we are looking for additional authors and their associated institutions to put out a joint communiqu? in a major journal summarizing these points.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:New Energy]]
[[Category:Cosmology]]