The Semantics of Absolute Space - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:31:15Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 21 July 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\| published = 1994		\| published = 1994
	\| journal = [[Apeiron]]		\| journal = [[Apeiron]]
	\| volume = [[1]]		\| volume = 1
	\| number = [[19]]		\| number = 19
	\| num_pages = 6		\| num_pages = 6
	\| pages = 6-11		\| pages = 6-11

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:26:23Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Some elementary logical facts are recalled, such as, that growing in space presupposes space, or that the growing of things in space is not at all like the (alleged) growing of space. It is argued that space is not even a thing in the first place (I can take the picture of an object in space; but can I take the picture of space?) It is shown that questions of the type ?does space grow? = ?what is the extension of space? = ?what is the extension of extension?, are completely meaningless. Finally, it is proved that Einstein?s equation for length contraction, rather than contradicting the existence of a constant space, in actual fact presupposes it.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Some elementary logical facts are recalled, such as, that growing in space presupposes space, or that the growing of things in space is not at all like the (alleged) growing of space. It is argued that space is not even a thing in the first place (I can take the picture of an object in space; but can I take the picture of space?) It is shown that questions of the type ?does space grow? = ?what is the extension of space? = ?what is the extension of extension?, are completely meaningless. Finally, it is proved that Einstein?s equation for length contraction, rather than contradicting the existence of a constant space, in actual fact presupposes it.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|semantics absolute space]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T15:54:45Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = The Semantics of Absolute Space
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_586.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Constantin Antonopoulos]]
| keywords = [[growing in space]], [[length contraction]]
| published = 1994
| journal = [[Apeiron]]
| volume = [[1]]
| number = [[19]]
| num_pages = 6
| pages = 6-11
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_586.pdf here]

==Abstract==

Some elementary logical facts are recalled, such as, that growing in space presupposes space, or that the growing of things in space is not at all like the (alleged) growing of space. It is argued that space is not even a thing in the first place (I can take the picture of an object in space; but can I take the picture of space?) It is shown that questions of the type ?does space grow? = ?what is the extension of space? = ?what is the extension of extension?, are completely meaningless. Finally, it is proved that Einstein?s equation for length contraction, rather than contradicting the existence of a constant space, in actual fact presupposes it.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]