The Necessity For Earth Expansion - Revision history

ClaudeBot: Add to Category:Expansion Tectonics

2026-07-20T13:26:41Z

Add to Category:Expansion Tectonics

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:26, 20 July 2026
Line 16:		Line 16:

	[[Category:Gravity\|necessity earth expansion]]		[[Category:Gravity\|necessity earth expansion]]

			[[Category:Expansion Tectonics]]

ClaudeBot: Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive)

2026-07-20T13:19:45Z

Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:19, 20 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = The Necessity For Earth Expansion		\| title = The Necessity For Earth Expansion
			\| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20091027124141/http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/8098/Symposium/Tnfee.htm Link to paper (Internet Archive)]
	\| author = [[Samuel Warren Carey]]		\| author = [[Samuel Warren Carey]]
	\| keywords = [[Earth expansion]], [[Pangaea]], [[Palaeomagnetism]], [[Orogeny]]		\| keywords = [[Earth expansion]], [[Pangaea]], [[Palaeomagnetism]], [[Orogeny]]
	\| published = 1981		\| published = 1981
	}}		}}

			'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20091027124141/http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/8098/Symposium/Tnfee.htm here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)''

	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

ClaudeBot: Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

2026-07-18T23:31:51Z

Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 18 July 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\| keywords = [[Earth expansion]], [[Pangaea]], [[Palaeomagnetism]], [[Orogeny]]		\| keywords = [[Earth expansion]], [[Pangaea]], [[Palaeomagnetism]], [[Orogeny]]
	\| published = 1981		\| published = 1981
	~~\| journal = [[None]]~~
	}}		}}

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T03:04:43Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:04, 1 January 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|necessity earth expansion]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|necessity earth expansion]]

	[[Category:Gravity]]		[[Category:Gravity\|necessity earth expansion]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:20:44Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:20, 1 January 2017
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Pangaea, reconstructed on a globe of present Earth radius, occupies a little more than a hemisphere, the remainder being the EoPacific Ocean. Opening of the Arctic, Atlantic, Indian, and Southern Oceans, nearly doubled the area of Pangaea. Hence on a constant-radius Earth the Pacific would have been reduced virtually to zero. This is not so. Instead, each of the continental blocks around the Pacific has separated from its neighbours by large amounts in the direction of the Pacific perimeter, so that the Pacific, far from reducing to near zero, has greatly increased in area. This is impossible except on an expanding Earth. Palaeomagnetic measurements show that all of the continents except Antarctica have converged on the Arctic by several tens of degrees since the Permian. Wholly independent data from the Triassic Jurassic and Cretaceous give the same conclusion in progressively diminishing degree. Yet throughout this time the Arctic has been an area of extension. This is absurd unless the Earth has greatly expanded. Several other independent sets of data set out herein require Earth expansion. All the characters of orogeny ? heat flux, vulcanism, plutonics, attitudes of thrusts and lineations, incidence of metamorphics, distribution and incidence of seismicity, and others, fit better the expansion model of diapiric orogenesis than the subduction model. Expansion has been denied on limits of palaeogravity, palaeomagnetic compilations, and the condition of other planets. Many of these criticisms are Quixotic ? setting up a model. then proceeding to demolish it, but the criticisms do not apply to the model herein proposed Others are simply invalid.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Pangaea, reconstructed on a globe of present Earth radius, occupies a little more than a hemisphere, the remainder being the EoPacific Ocean. Opening of the Arctic, Atlantic, Indian, and Southern Oceans, nearly doubled the area of Pangaea. Hence on a constant-radius Earth the Pacific would have been reduced virtually to zero. This is not so. Instead, each of the continental blocks around the Pacific has separated from its neighbours by large amounts in the direction of the Pacific perimeter, so that the Pacific, far from reducing to near zero, has greatly increased in area. This is impossible except on an expanding Earth. Palaeomagnetic measurements show that all of the continents except Antarctica have converged on the Arctic by several tens of degrees since the Permian. Wholly independent data from the Triassic Jurassic and Cretaceous give the same conclusion in progressively diminishing degree. Yet throughout this time the Arctic has been an area of extension. This is absurd unless the Earth has greatly expanded. Several other independent sets of data set out herein require Earth expansion. All the characters of orogeny ? heat flux, vulcanism, plutonics, attitudes of thrusts and lineations, incidence of metamorphics, distribution and incidence of seismicity, and others, fit better the expansion model of diapiric orogenesis than the subduction model. Expansion has been denied on limits of palaeogravity, palaeomagnetic compilations, and the condition of other planets. Many of these criticisms are Quixotic ? setting up a model. then proceeding to demolish it, but the criticisms do not apply to the model herein proposed Others are simply invalid.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|necessity earth expansion]]

	[[Category:Gravity]]		[[Category:Gravity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T15:25:24Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = The Necessity For Earth Expansion
| author = [[Samuel Warren Carey]]
| keywords = [[Earth expansion]], [[Pangaea]], [[Palaeomagnetism]], [[Orogeny]]
| published = 1981
| journal = [[None]]
}}

==Abstract==

Pangaea, reconstructed on a globe of present Earth radius, occupies a little more than a hemisphere, the remainder being the EoPacific Ocean. Opening of the Arctic, Atlantic, Indian, and Southern Oceans, nearly doubled the area of Pangaea. Hence on a constant-radius Earth the Pacific would have been reduced virtually to zero. This is not so. Instead, each of the continental blocks around the Pacific has separated from its neighbours by large amounts in the direction of the Pacific perimeter, so that the Pacific, far from reducing to near zero, has greatly increased in area. This is impossible except on an expanding Earth. Palaeomagnetic measurements show that all of the continents except Antarctica have converged on the Arctic by several tens of degrees since the Permian. Wholly independent data from the Triassic Jurassic and Cretaceous give the same conclusion in progressively diminishing degree. Yet throughout this time the Arctic has been an area of extension. This is absurd unless the Earth has greatly expanded. Several other independent sets of data set out herein require Earth expansion. All the characters of orogeny ? heat flux, vulcanism, plutonics, attitudes of thrusts and lineations, incidence of metamorphics, distribution and incidence of seismicity, and others, fit better the expansion model of diapiric orogenesis than the subduction model. Expansion has been denied on limits of palaeogravity, palaeomagnetic compilations, and the condition of other planets. Many of these criticisms are Quixotic ? setting up a model. then proceeding to demolish it, but the criticisms do not apply to the model herein proposed Others are simply invalid.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Gravity]]