The Failure of E = mc2 - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:21:06Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:21, 21 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| published = 2005		\| published = 2005
	\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]		\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
	\| volume = [[2]]		\| volume = 2
	\| pages = 38-40		\| pages = 38-40
	}}		}}

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T03:01:54Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 1 January 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|failure e mc]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|failure e mc]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|failure e mc]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:14:52Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:14, 1 January 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	The 2005 John Edgar Chappell Memorial Lecture of the Natural Philosophy Alliance. Over the course of some years I had many long and intense telephone conversations with John Chappell. We were in full agreement with regard to the unsatisfactory status of the teaching of physics. Our arguments concerned what the Natural Philosophy Alliance should do to try and remedy the situation. John felt our primary purpose was to reveal to the profession and the general public what is wrong with Einstein?s relativity theories. My view has been - and still is - that science would be better served if we proposed and discussed alternative physics paradigms. To honor Chappell?s wish in this lecture I will comply with it and criticize relativity theory.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		The 2005 John Edgar Chappell Memorial Lecture of the Natural Philosophy Alliance. Over the course of some years I had many long and intense telephone conversations with John Chappell. We were in full agreement with regard to the unsatisfactory status of the teaching of physics. Our arguments concerned what the Natural Philosophy Alliance should do to try and remedy the situation. John felt our primary purpose was to reveal to the profession and the general public what is wrong with Einstein?s relativity theories. My view has been - and still is - that science would be better served if we proposed and discussed alternative physics paradigms. To honor Chappell?s wish in this lecture I will comply with it and criticize relativity theory.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|failure e mc]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T02:55:50Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = The Failure of E = mc2
| author = [[Peter Graneau]]
| keywords = [[Special Relativity]]
| published = 2005
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[2]]
| pages = 38-40
}}

==Abstract==

The 2005 John Edgar Chappell Memorial Lecture of the Natural Philosophy Alliance. Over the course of some years I had many long and intense telephone conversations with John Chappell. We were in full agreement with regard to the unsatisfactory status of the teaching of physics. Our arguments concerned what the Natural Philosophy Alliance should do to try and remedy the situation. John felt our primary purpose was to reveal to the profession and the general public what is wrong with Einstein?s relativity theories. My view has been - and still is - that science would be better served if we proposed and discussed alternative physics paradigms. To honor Chappell?s wish in this lecture I will comply with it and criticize relativity theory.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]