The Doppler Observations of Venus Contradict the SRT - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:23:04Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:23, 21 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| published = 1993		\| published = 1993
	\| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]		\| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
	\| volume = [[4]]		\| volume = 4
	\| number = [[1]]		\| number = 1
	\| pages = 3-6		\| pages = 3-6
	}}		}}

ClaudeBot: Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug

2026-07-20T03:36:35Z

Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:36, 19 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = The Doppler Observations of Venus Contradict the SRT		\| title = The Doppler Observations of Venus Contradict the SRT
	\| author = [[Svetlana Tochel\'Nikova-Muri]]		\| author = [[Svetlana Tochel'Nikova-Muri]]
	\| keywords = [[frequency shift]], [[Venus]], [[electromagnetic]]		\| keywords = [[frequency shift]], [[Venus]], [[electromagnetic]]
	\| published = 1993		\| published = 1993

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T03:00:39Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:00, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|doppler observations venus contradict srt]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|doppler observations venus contradict srt]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|doppler observations venus contradict srt]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:12:51Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 1 January 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	The empirical formula for the frequency shift of a radar signal returned from Venus, found in [2] as the best approximation to the observed data up to second-order terms in <em>u/c</em> is identical with a formula derived by the author directly from classical physics, and differs from the relativistic frequency shift. The paper shows the basic errors made by the authors of [2] in order to obtain "agreement" of their observations with relativistic physics. Correction of these errors leads to agreement of the experimental data with the <em>classical</em> theory of the propagation of electromagnetic oscillations and to the inevitability of perfecting the method of reduction of radar observations, which in the final outcome will lead to a higher precision of the ephemerides.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		The empirical formula for the frequency shift of a radar signal returned from Venus, found in [2] as the best approximation to the observed data up to second-order terms in <em>u/c</em> is identical with a formula derived by the author directly from classical physics, and differs from the relativistic frequency shift. The paper shows the basic errors made by the authors of [2] in order to obtain "agreement" of their observations with relativistic physics. Correction of these errors leads to agreement of the experimental data with the <em>classical</em> theory of the propagation of electromagnetic oscillations and to the inevitability of perfecting the method of reduction of radar observations, which in the final outcome will lead to a higher precision of the ephemerides.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|doppler observations venus contradict srt]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:03:51Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = The Doppler Observations of Venus Contradict the SRT
| author = [[Svetlana Tochel\'Nikova-Muri]]
| keywords = [[frequency shift]], [[Venus]], [[electromagnetic]]
| published = 1993
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| volume = [[4]]
| number = [[1]]
| pages = 3-6
}}

==Abstract==

The empirical formula for the frequency shift of a radar signal returned from Venus, found in [2] as the best approximation to the observed data up to second-order terms in <em>u/c</em> is identical with a formula derived by the author directly from classical physics, and differs from the relativistic frequency shift. The paper shows the basic errors made by the authors of [2] in order to obtain "agreement" of their observations with relativistic physics. Correction of these errors leads to agreement of the experimental data with the <em>classical</em> theory of the propagation of electromagnetic oscillations and to the inevitability of perfecting the method of reduction of radar observations, which in the final outcome will lead to a higher precision of the ephemerides.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]