Symmetries and Asymmetries in Classical and Relativistic Electrodynamics - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:25:04Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:25, 21 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| published = 1991		\| published = 1991
	\| journal = [[Foundations of Physics]]		\| journal = [[Foundations of Physics]]
	\| volume = [[21]]		\| volume = 21
	\| number = [[7]]		\| number = 7
	\| pages = 787-801		\| pages = 787-801
	}}		}}

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:57:49Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|symmetries asymmetries classical relativistic electrodynamics]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|symmetries asymmetries classical relativistic electrodynamics]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|symmetries asymmetries classical relativistic electrodynamics]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:08:17Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 1 January 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	By a comparison between maxwell's electrodynamics classically interpreted (MT) and relativistic electrodynamics (RED), this paper discusses whether the "asymmetries" in MT mentioned by A. Einstein in his 1905 relativity paper are only of a conceptual nature of rather involve specific empirical claims. It is shown that in fact MT predicts strongly asymmetric behaviour for very simple interactions, and an analysis is made of the extent of the ?symmetry? achieved by means of relativistic postulates. A "low" velocity experiment is suggested which could provide another test of the accuracy of RED with respect to MT.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		By a comparison between maxwell's electrodynamics classically interpreted (MT) and relativistic electrodynamics (RED), this paper discusses whether the "asymmetries" in MT mentioned by A. Einstein in his 1905 relativity paper are only of a conceptual nature of rather involve specific empirical claims. It is shown that in fact MT predicts strongly asymmetric behaviour for very simple interactions, and an analysis is made of the extent of the ?symmetry? achieved by means of relativistic postulates. A "low" velocity experiment is suggested which could provide another test of the accuracy of RED with respect to MT.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|symmetries asymmetries classical relativistic electrodynamics]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:16:00Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Symmetries and Asymmetries in Classical and Relativistic Electrodynamics
| author = [[Umberto Bartocci]], [[Marco Mamone Capria]]
| keywords = [[Classical Electrodynamics]], [[Relativistic Electrodynamics]]
| published = 1991
| journal = [[Foundations of Physics]]
| volume = [[21]]
| number = [[7]]
| pages = 787-801
}}

==Abstract==

By a comparison between maxwell's electrodynamics classically interpreted (MT) and relativistic electrodynamics (RED), this paper discusses whether the "asymmetries" in MT mentioned by A. Einstein in his 1905 relativity paper are only of a conceptual nature of rather involve specific empirical claims. It is shown that in fact MT predicts strongly asymmetric behaviour for very simple interactions, and an analysis is made of the extent of the ?symmetry? achieved by means of relativistic postulates. A "low" velocity experiment is suggested which could provide another test of the accuracy of RED with respect to MT.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]